|
Contents |
6 |
|
|
Preface |
9 |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY |
14 |
|
|
PART 1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION AND MAIN CONCLUSIONS |
22 |
|
|
1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION |
24 |
|
|
1.1 The ISI Citation Indexes as search and research tools |
24 |
|
|
1.2 Quantitative science and technology studies |
28 |
|
|
1.3 Scope and structure of the book |
32 |
|
|
2 BASIC NOTIONS AND GENERAL CONCLUSIONS |
38 |
|
|
2.1 Introduction |
38 |
|
|
2.2 About the nature of the concept of scholarly research quality |
38 |
|
|
2.3 Characteristics of research evaluation and policy processes |
39 |
|
|
2.4 Use of bibliometric indicators in research evaluation and policy |
41 |
|
|
2.5 The role of bibliometric investigators |
43 |
|
|
2.6 The role of scholars subjected to citation analysis |
44 |
|
|
2.7 The role of evaluators |
45 |
|
|
2.8 Citation analysis and peer review |
46 |
|
|
3 SYNOPSIS |
48 |
|
|
Part 2.1 Assessing basic science research departments and scientific journals |
48 |
|
|
Part 2.2 The ISI Citation Indexes |
54 |
|
|
Part 2.3 Assessing research performance in social sciences and humanities |
57 |
|
|
Part 2.4 Accuracy issues |
60 |
|
|
Part 2.5 Theoretical aspects |
63 |
|
|
Part 2.6 Citation analysis and peer review |
68 |
|
|
Part 2.7 Macro studies |
72 |
|
|
Part 2.8 New developments |
78 |
|
|
Part 2 Empirical and Theoretical Chapters |
83 |
|
|
PART 2.1 ASSESSING BASIC SCIENCE RESEARCH DEPARTMENTS AND SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS |
83 |
|
|
CITATION ANALYSIS OF BASIC SCIENCE RESEARCH DEPARTMENTS |
84 |
|
|
4.1 Introduction |
84 |
|
|
4.2 Data collection and accuracy |
89 |
|
|
4.3 ISI Citation Indexes: coverage, biases |
91 |
|
|
4.4 General validity issues |
93 |
|
|
4.5 Indicators and their validity |
97 |
|
|
4.6 General issues of interpretation and use |
100 |
|
|
CITATION ANALYSIS OF SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS |
103 |
|
|
5.1 Introduction |
103 |
|
|
5.2 Issues regarding ISI/JCR impact factor |
104 |
|
|
5.3 Normalised journal impact measures |
112 |
|
|
5.4 Further issues and conclusions |
114 |
|
|
PART 2.2 THE ISI CITATION INDEXES |
120 |
|
|
BASIC PRINCIPLES, CITATION LINKS AND TERMINOLOGY |
122 |
|
|
6.1 Introduction |
122 |
|
|
6.2 Basic principles |
123 |
|
|
6.3 Citation links and terminology |
127 |
|
|
ISI COVERAGE BY DISCIPLINE |
132 |
|
|
7.1 Introduction |
132 |
|
|
7.2 Some earlier studies of ISI coverage |
133 |
|
|
7.3 Coverage indicators and their interpretation |
135 |
|
|
7.4 Results at an aggregate level |
136 |
|
|
7.5 Results per discipline |
138 |
|
|
7.6 Journal internationality by discipline |
144 |
|
|
7.7 Discussion and conclusions |
145 |
|
|
IMPLICATIONS FOR THE USE OF THE ISI CITATION INDEXES IN RESEARCH EVALUATION |
150 |
|
|
8.1 Introduction |
150 |
|
|
8.2 Four types of research assessment studies |
152 |
|
|
8.3 Examples |
155 |
|
|
PART 2.3 ASSESSING SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES |
158 |
|
|
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SCIENCE, SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES |
160 |
|
|
9.1 Introduction |
160 |
|
|
9.2 Methodology for the development of research performance indicators in social sciences and humanities |
164 |
|
|
EXPANDED CITATION ANALYSIS: A CASE STUDY IN ECONOMICS |
166 |
|
|
10.1 Introduction |
166 |
|
|
10.2 Citation impact indicators for documents in non-ISI covered media |
167 |
|
|
10.3 Results |
168 |
|
|
10.4 Concluding remarks |
170 |
|
|
A CASE STUDY OF RESEARCH PERFORMANCE IN LAW |
172 |
|
|
11.1 Introduction |
172 |
|
|
11.2 Analysis of earlier assessments |
173 |
|
|
11.3 Publication lists and classifications |
174 |
|
|
11.4 Analysis of classifications and quality perceptions |
175 |
|
|
11.5 Comments by Deans of law departments |
178 |
|
|
PART 2.4 ACCURACY ASPECTS |
181 |
|
|
INTRODUCTORY NOTES ON ACCURACY ISSUES |
182 |
|
|
12.1 Introduction |
182 |
|
|
12.2 Notes by Eugene Garfield |
183 |
|
|
ACCURACY OF CITATION COUNTS |
186 |
|
|
13.1 Introduction and research questions |
186 |
|
|
13.2 Data and methods |
187 |
|
|
13.3 Results |
188 |
|
|
13.4 Discussion and conclusions |
192 |
|
|
PROBLEMS WITH THE NAMES OF AUTHORS AND INSTITUTIONS, AND WITH THE DELIMITATION OF SUBFIELDS |
194 |
|
|
14.1 Author names |
194 |
|
|
14.2 Institutional affiliations |
196 |
|
|
14.3 Discipline and subfield delimitations |
200 |
|
|
PART 2.5 THEORETICAL ASPECTS |
204 |
|
|
WHAT DO REFERENCES AND CITATIONS MEASURE? |
206 |
|
|
15.1 Introduction |
206 |
|
|
15.2 Disciplinary approaches |
208 |
|
|
15.3 Views of scholars |
211 |
|
|
TOWARDS A THEORY OF CITATION: SOME BUILDING BLOCKS |
222 |
|
|
16.1 Introduction |
222 |
|
|
16.2 Reference lists are selective and contain both unique and more commonly used cited references |
224 |
|
|
16.3 Extreme positions are not useful in the debate on citation theories |
226 |
|
|
16.4 Comments on the views of scholars discussed in Chapter 15 |
227 |
|
|
16.5 Research articles are elements of publication ensembles of research groups carrying out aresearch programme |
229 |
|
|
16.6 A reference list constitutes a distinct part of a paper with proper functions |
231 |
|
|
IMPLICATIONS FOR THE USE OF CITATION ANALYSIS IN RESEARCH EVALUATION |
234 |
|
|
17.1 What do citations measure? |
234 |
|
|
17.2 Implications |
237 |
|
|
PART 2.6 CITATION ANALYSIS AND PEER REVIEW |
240 |
|
|
PEER REVIEW AND THE USE AND VALIDITY OF CITATION ANALYSIS |
242 |
|
|
18.1 Introduction |
242 |
|
|
18.2 About peer review |
242 |
|
|
18.3 Use of bibliometric indicators within peer review |
246 |
|
|
18.4 Validation of bibliometric indicators regarding individual scholars and research departments |
247 |
|
|
ANALYSIS OF PEER ASSESSMENTS OF RESEARCH DEPARTMENTS |
252 |
|
|
19.1 Introduction |
252 |
|
|
19.2 Data and methods |
253 |
|
|
19.3 Results |
254 |
|
|
19.4 Discussion and conclusions |
257 |
|
|
Notes |
258 |
|
|
ANALYSIS OF A NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL |
260 |
|
|
20.1 Introduction |
260 |
|
|
20.2 Data and methods |
261 |
|
|
20.3 Results |
263 |
|
|
20.4 Discussion and conclusions |
270 |
|
|
PART 2.7 MACRO STUDIES |
272 |
|
|
DID GLOBAL SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATION PRODUCTIVITY INCREASE DURING THE 1980s AND 1990s? |
274 |
|
|
21.1 Introduction |
274 |
|
|
21.2 Further analysis at an aggregate level |
276 |
|
|
21.3 Analysis by discipline |
278 |
|
|
21.4 Discussion and conclusions |
280 |
|
|
Notes |
282 |
|
|
MEASURING TRENDS IN NATIONAL PUBLICATION OUTPUT |
283 |
|
|
22.1 Introduction |
283 |
|
|
22.2 Difficulties in constructing and interpreting publication based macro indicators |
285 |
|
|
22.3 Eleven indicators and their interpretation |
287 |
|
|
22.4 Conclusions |
290 |
|
|
22.5 Afterword: Detailed discussion of Table 22.1 |
291 |
|
|
DOES INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC COLLABORATION PAY? |
297 |
|
|
23.1 Introduction |
297 |
|
|
23.2 Data, methods and results |
298 |
|
|
23.3 Conclusions |
302 |
|
|
DO US SCIENTISTS OVERCITE PAPERS FROM THEIR OWN COUNTRY? |
303 |
|
|
24.1 Introduction |
303 |
|
|
24.2 Data |
304 |
|
|
24.3 The factor size of domestic publication output |
305 |
|
|
24.4 Other factors |
309 |
|
|
24.5 Discussion and conclusions |
312 |
|
|
PART 2.8 NEW DEVELOPMENTS |
314 |
|
|
DEVELOPMENT OF NEW INDICATORS |
316 |
|
|
25.1 Introduction |
316 |
|
|
25.2 New indicators |
317 |
|
|
ELECTRONIC PUBLISHING, NEW DATABASES AND SEARCH ENGINES |
326 |
|
|
26.1 Electronic publishing |
326 |
|
|
26.2 New databases and search engines |
329 |
|
|
FURTHER RESEARCH |
331 |
|
|
27.1 Introduction |
331 |
|
|
27.2 Assessment of the actual use of citation analysis and its effects |
331 |
|
|
27.3 Rankings versus relational indicators |
333 |
|
|
References |
336 |
|
|
Index of Keywords, Cited Works and Cited Authors |
350 |
|