|
TABLE OF CONTENTS |
6 |
|
|
PREFACE |
10 |
|
|
CONTRIBUTORS |
12 |
|
|
PART I RECENT ADVANCES IN PURIFICATION AND SPECIAL TREATMENT OF WATER AND WATER QUALITY MONITORING |
18 |
|
|
ADVANCES IN DRINKING WATER TREATMENT IN THE UNITED STATES |
20 |
|
|
ABSTRACT |
20 |
|
|
INTRODUCTION |
20 |
|
|
DRINKING WATER CONTAMINANT MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK |
21 |
|
|
ARSENIC IN DRINKING WATER: CASE STUDY |
23 |
|
|
EMERGING RESEARCH |
24 |
|
|
REFERENCES |
25 |
|
|
DEPOSITIONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF LAKE SEDIMENTS IN CANADA AS DETERMINED BY PB-210 AND Cs-137 |
26 |
|
|
ABSTRACT |
26 |
|
|
1. INTRODUCTION |
27 |
|
|
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS |
28 |
|
|
2.1. Site locations and physical characteristics of the lakes |
28 |
|
|
2.2. Sediment collection, preparation and analysis |
29 |
|
|
2.3. Methodology of estimating depositional characteristics of lake sediments |
31 |
|
|
2.3. Biosensors Based on Bioluminescent Bacteria |
71 |
|
|
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
34 |
|
|
4. CONCLUSIONS |
63 |
|
|
5. REFERENCES |
65 |
|
|
BIOSENSORS FOR WATER QUALITY MONITORING |
68 |
|
|
1. INTRODUCTION |
68 |
|
|
2.BIOSENSORS FOR THE DETERMINATION OFTOTAL TOXICITY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINANTS |
69 |
|
|
3. BIOSENSORS FOR THE DETERMINATION OF GROUP SPECIFIC TOXIC SUBSTANCES AND THEIR INDIVIDUAL COMPONENTS |
82 |
|
|
4. CONCLUSIONS |
86 |
|
|
5. REFERENCES |
86 |
|
|
RAPID DETECTION OF BACTERIA IN DRINKING WATER R.A. |
88 |
|
|
ABSTRACT |
88 |
|
|
INTRODUCTION |
89 |
|
|
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
90 |
|
|
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
92 |
|
|
CONCLUSIONS |
93 |
|
|
FURTHER STUDIES |
94 |
|
|
REFERENCES |
94 |
|
|
UTILIZATION OF MOBILE ANALYTICAL TESTS INWASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT |
96 |
|
|
ABSTRACT |
96 |
|
|
INTRODUCTION |
96 |
|
|
THEORETICAL PART |
97 |
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL PART |
98 |
|
|
CONCLUSIONS |
102 |
|
|
REFERENCES |
103 |
|
|
AN EVALUATION OF THE EFFICACY OF THE MIXED-OXIDANT SOLUTIONS PRODUCED FROM “ACTIVATEDWATER” IN COOLING TOWER BIOLOGICAL CONTROL |
104 |
|
|
ABSTRACT |
104 |
|
|
INTRODUCTION |
105 |
|
|
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
108 |
|
|
MICROBIOLOGICAL AND CHEMICAL ANALYSES |
110 |
|
|
RESULTS |
111 |
|
|
DISCUSSION |
112 |
|
|
CONCLUSIONS |
113 |
|
|
REFERENCES |
114 |
|
|
PART II DEVELOPMENT OF MODERN TECHNOLOGIES OF SPECIAL WATER TREATMENT FOR USE IN VARIOUS AREAS OF SCIENCE, INDUSTRY AND PUBLIC HEALTH |
116 |
|
|
FIBROID SORBENTS FOR WATER PURIFICATION |
118 |
|
|
ABSTRACT |
118 |
|
|
INTRODUCTION |
119 |
|
|
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
119 |
|
|
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
121 |
|
|
CONCLUSIONS |
124 |
|
|
REFERENCES |
125 |
|
|
USE OF IN-SITU OXYGEN CURTAIN TECHNOLOGY IN ENHANCED BIOREMEDIATION OF GROUNDWATER |
126 |
|
|
ABSTRACT |
126 |
|
|
INTRODUCTION |
127 |
|
|
iSOC™ TECHNOLOGY |
127 |
|
|
iSOC™ ENHANCED REMEDIATION |
128 |
|
|
iSOC™ INSTALLATION AND CONTROL |
129 |
|
|
iSOC™ DEMO CASE STUDY |
129 |
|
|
ELECTROCHEMICALLY-STIMULATED SORPTION AND SORPTION-MEMBRANE METHODS FOR REMOVAL OF IONIC IMPURITIES FROM WATER |
132 |
|
|
INTRODUCTION |
132 |
|
|
INNOVATIVE WATER PURIFICATION METHOD AND DEVICES V. Gevod, I. Reshetnyak, S. Gevod, I. Shklyarova and A. Rudenko |
154 |
|
|
NEW INORGANIC MATERIALS AND ELECTROCHEMICALLY-STIMULATED SORPTION |
137 |
|
|
ELECTROCHEMICALLY-STIMULATED PROCESS ON SORPTION-ACTIVE MEMBRANES |
144 |
|
|
REFERENCES |
152 |
|
|
INNOVATIVE WATER PURIFICATION METHOD AND DEVICES |
154 |
|
|
ABSTRACT |
154 |
|
|
WHAT IS THE PROBLEM? |
155 |
|
|
HOW IS THE PROBLEM SOLVED AT PRESENT? |
156 |
|
|
WHAT SYSTEM CAN BE CONSIDERED AS AN ALTERNATIVE? |
157 |
|
|
DESIGN AND MODE OF OPERATION OF THE ELEMENTARY BUBBLE-FILM EXTRACTOR |
159 |
|
|
THE RESULTS OF THE TEST OF THE ELEMENTARY BUBBLE-FILM EXTRACTOR |
160 |
|
|
WATER PURIFIERS BASED ON BUBBLE-FILM EXTRACTION |
163 |
|
|
SUMMARY |
164 |
|
|
REFERENCES |
166 |
|
|
POTENTIALITIES OF MEMBRANE OPERATIONS INWATER TREATMENTS |
168 |
|
|
INTRODUCTION |
168 |
|
|
MEMBRANE CONTACTORS IN THE SPARKLING WATER PROCESS |
168 |
|
|
PRODUCTION OF WATER WITH CONTROLLED COMPOSITION USING INTEGRATED MEMBRANE SYSTEMS |
171 |
|
|
INTEGRATED MEMBRANE SYSTEMS IN WATER DESALINATION |
172 |
|
|
MEMBRANE CONTACTORS FORWATER PURIFICATION IN THE PETROCHEMICAL INDUSTRY |
174 |
|
|
CONCLUSIONS |
175 |
|
|
REFERENCES |
175 |
|
|
WATER DISINFECTION USING SILVER AND COPPER IONS AND COLLOIDAL GOLD |
176 |
|
|
ABSTRACT |
176 |
|
|
INTRODUCTION |
176 |
|
|
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
177 |
|
|
REFERENCES |
183 |
|
|
PART III TOOLSANDMETHODS FOR ACHIEVEMENT OF HIGH TECHNOLOGICAL PARAMETERS OF WATER PURIFICATION AND WASTEWATER TREATMENT |
184 |
|
|
WATER SAVINGS AND REUSE IN THE TEXTILE INDUSTRY |
186 |
|
|
ABSTRACT |
186 |
|
|
INTRODUCTION |
187 |
|
|
STRATEGY FORWATER SAVINGS AND REUSE IN TEXTILE WET PROCESSING |
190 |
|
|
WATER SAVINGS BY PROCESS INTENSIFICATION |
192 |
|
|
WATER SAVINGS AND REUSE BY PROCESS INTEGRATION |
195 |
|
|
WATER RECLAMATION AND REUSE |
200 |
|
|
CONCLUSIONS |
204 |
|
|
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
204 |
|
|
REFERENCES |
205 |
|
|
BIOCIDE POLYMERS - NEW OPPORTUNITIES IN WATER TREATMENT |
208 |
|
|
REFERENCES |
212 |
|
|
OPTIMIZATION OF GALVANIC WASTEWATER TREATMENT PROCESSES |
214 |
|
|
ABSTRACT |
214 |
|
|
ELECTROPLATING ACTIVITY IN LITHUANIA |
214 |
|
|
CLEANER PRODUCTION METHODS FOR ELECTROPLATING PROCESSES |
215 |
|
|
EFFICIENCY OF CLEANER PRODUCTION MEASURES IN LITHUANIANGALVANIC COMPANIES |
218 |
|
|
CASE STUDIES |
219 |
|
|
MODERNIZATION OF THE GALVANIZATION TECHNOLOGICAL PROCESS AND THE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT AT JSC “VINGRIAI” |
221 |
|
|
REFERENCES |
224 |
|
|
EFFICIENCY OF NITRIFICATION AND DENITRIFICATION PROCESSES INWASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANTS |
226 |
|
|
ABSTRACT |
226 |
|
|
INTRODUCTION |
226 |
|
|
THEORETICAL PART |
227 |
|
|
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
228 |
|
|
CONCLUSIONS |
234 |
|
|
REFERENCES |
234 |
|
|
ELECTROCHEMI AL PROCESSES FOR WASTEWATER PURIFICATION UTILIZING FLUIDISED BEDS OF PARTICLES WITH DIFFERENT CONDUCTIVITY |
236 |
|
|
ABSTRACT |
236 |
|
|
INTRODUCTION |
236 |
|
|
HYDRAULIC STRUCTURE OF THE FLUIDIZED BED ELECTROCHEMICAL SYSTEM |
238 |
|
|
REACTORSWITH FLUIDIZED BEDS OF NONCONDUCTING BEADS |
239 |
|
|
FLUIDIZED BED ELECTRODE (FBE) REACTORS |
242 |
|
|
ELECTROCHEMICAL REACTORS WITH BEDS OF INORGANIC ION EXCHANGE MATERIALS BASED ON TI AND ZR PHOSPHATES |
246 |
|
|
SUMMARY |
249 |
|
|
REFERENCES |
250 |
|
|
COLD PLASMA AS A NEW TOOL FOR PURIFICATION OFWASTEWATER |
252 |
|
|
INTRODUCTION |
252 |
|
|
CHEMICAL PROCESSES INWATER INDUCED BY NONEQUILIBRIUM LOW-TEMPERATURE PLASMA |
253 |
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS |
258 |
|
|
REFERENCES |
261 |
|
|
PURIFICATION OF INDUSTRIAL WATERS FROM ORGANIC COMPOUNDS AND BACTERIA |
262 |
|
|
INTRODUCTION |
262 |
|
|
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
263 |
|
|
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
265 |
|
|
CONCLUSIONS |
268 |
|
|
REFERENCES |
268 |
|
|
PART IV MANAGEMENT OF WATER RESOURCES, PLANNING, TRAINING AND EDUCATION IN WATER TREATMENT |
270 |
|
|
INDUSTRY UNIVERSITY COOPERATION FOR POSTGRADUATE EDUCATION AND TRAINING IN THE WATER TREATMENT AREA |
272 |
|
|
INTRODUCTION |
272 |
|
|
HOW DOES IT WORK? |
273 |
|
|
THE STRUCTURE OF A TYPICAL I/UCRC |
274 |
|
|
INDICATORS OF SUCCESS |
275 |
|
|
TRANSFER OF THE CONCEPT TONORTHERN IRELAND |
276 |
|
|
LOCAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE NSF CONCEPT |
277 |
|
|
LOCAL EXTENSIONS TO THE CONCEPT |
278 |
|
|
FOCUS |
279 |
|
|
INTERDISCIPLINARITY |
279 |
|
|
KNOWLEDGE AND TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER |
280 |
|
|
OWNERSHIP BY THE MEMBERS |
280 |
|
|
EVALUATION |
281 |
|
|
CONCLUSIONS |
281 |
|
|
REFERENCE |
281 |
|
|
WESTCOUNTRY RIVERS TRUST UNITED KINGDOM: A PIONEERING PROGRAMME FOR RESTORATION AND REGENERATION OF MAJOR RIVER BASINS |
282 |
|
|
INTRODUCTION |
282 |
|
|
TAMAR 2000 SUPPORT PROJECT |
283 |
|
|
OUTCOMES |
291 |
|
|
ASSOCIATION OF RIVERS TRUSTS – “ART” |
293 |
|
|
CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE |
294 |
|
|
SUMMARY |
295 |
|
|
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN WASTEWATER TREATMENT IN CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS IN POLAND |
296 |
|
|
ABSTRACT |
296 |
|
|
INTRODUCTION |
296 |
|
|
METHODS |
297 |
|
|
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
300 |
|
|
CONCLUSIONS |
309 |
|
|
REFERENCES |
310 |
|
|
WATER AND PUBLIC HEALTH: LEGISLATION AS A TOOL FOR IMPROVING LIVING STANDARDS |
312 |
|
|
ABSTRACT |
312 |
|
|
WATER FOR HUMAN USE |
313 |
|
|
WATER MANAGEMENT |
315 |
|
|
WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN CROATIA |
316 |
|
|
RECENT TRENDS |
320 |
|
|
CONCLUSIONS |
321 |
|
|
REFERENCES |
322 |
|
|
THE NATIONAL PROGRAMME FOR CONSTRUCTION OF URBANWASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS IN THE REPUBLICOF BULGARIA |
324 |
|
|
ABSTRACT |
324 |
|
|
INTRODUCTION |
325 |
|
|
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EU LEGISLATION CONCERNING WATER PROTECTION AND WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT1 |
325 |
|
|
CONCLUSIONS |
330 |
|
|
NOTES |
331 |
|
|
REFERENCES |
331 |
|
|
WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION ACTIONS IN ROMANIAN INDUSTRY |
332 |
|
|
ABSTRACT |
332 |
|
|
INTRODUCTION |
332 |
|
|
METALLURGICAL INDUSTRY |
333 |
|
|
AGRICULTURAL USE OF ANIMAL MANURE |
334 |
|
|
OIL STORAGE AT OIL TERMINAL CONSTANTA |
336 |
|
|
USINGWASTE AS RAW MATERIAL FOR RARE METALS RECOVERY |
340 |
|
|
REFERENCES |
340 |
|
|
SURFACE LIPID COMPOSITION OF TWO EMERGENTWATER PLANTS USED IN CONSTRUCTEDWETLANDS |
342 |
|
|
ABSTRACT |
342 |
|
|
INTRODUCTION |
342 |
|
|
METHODS |
343 |
|
|
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
344 |
|
|
CONCLUSIONS |
346 |
|
|
REFERENCES |
346 |
|
|
SUBJECT INDEX |
348 |
|